Joel, I found it interesting to read both points of view. It would a breath of fresh air to have these two men replace our 2 present canidates for our Presidential election. Imagine that, to have canidates who discuss the Universe, instead of claptrap (whatever that means)
Let's not forget to include The International Man - and honorable - Mr. Doug Casey within the statutes. Matthew Smith is the best wingman ever, as well.😎
I was confused before, therefore I am.
I may have to borrow that one!
Joel, I found it interesting to read both points of view. It would a breath of fresh air to have these two men replace our 2 present canidates for our Presidential election. Imagine that, to have canidates who discuss the Universe, instead of claptrap (whatever that means)
Just a question. You have provided 2 philosophers point of view. Where is the third?
As it happened, ABC’s “moderators” were unavailable that particular night…
Perhaps that was a good thing.
Certainly
Let's not forget to include The International Man - and honorable - Mr. Doug Casey within the statutes. Matthew Smith is the best wingman ever, as well.😎
From the beginning of me finding you and BPR I was intrigued about both of you and your approach to modern day society. That which sparked enthusiasm!
The future of the past is actually predictable.
Is there such a thing as Modern Wisdom 🤔
I'm thinking that's exactly the point.
I have been a subscriber to CW for a year :)
Excellent! And…thank you!
It is good thing our Greek philosophers did not have to deal with quantum mechanics.
They could still be arguing about the nature of reality.
(QM at some level negates the deterministic argument.)
Superb distillation